Enter your email address to get daily jokes, tips Guess Papers, Notes and Jobs in your Email in FREE and click Subscribe:

Free Listen and Read English Stories to Improve your English, Latest Children Stories, English Stories, Audio/ Video Stories in English

IELTS Marking System

IELTS Marking Criteria is different for Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening. Below is the details for each marking schemes. You will see that the easier tests have less marks and the tough tests have more bands. Similarly bands for the last points like 35 onwards increase rapidly, it does not mean that they are points for the question no 35 onwards, but they are the total points. That mean getting more points after 35 will help you to score more bands easily.

IELTS Listening marking schemes

For the listening test, which contains 40 questions, the approximate band scores can be calculated using this table.

Band Score 9 8.5 8 7.5 7 6.5 6 5.5 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5
Score / 40 39-40 37-38 35-36 32-34 30-31 26-29 23-25 18-22 16-17 13-15 10-12 8-10 6-7 4-5

 

IELTS General Reading marking schemes

For the general reading test, which contains 40 questions, the approximate band scores can be calculated using this table.

Band Score 9 8.5 8 7.5 7 6.5 6 5.5 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5
Score / 40 40 39 37-38 36 34-35 32-33 30-31 27-29 23-26 19-22 15-18 12-14 9-11 6-8

 

IELTS Academic Reading marking schemes

For the academic reading test, which also contains 40 questions, but is more difficult, the approximate band scores can be calculated using this table.

Band Score 9 8.5 8 7.5 7 6.5 6 5.5 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5
Score / 40 39-40 37-38 35-36 33-34 30-32 27-29 23-26 19-22 15-18 13-14 10-12 8-9 6-7 4-5

 

IELTS Writing marking schemes

According to Exam english website The two writing questions are marked out of 9 according to the following criteria:

  Task Achievement Coherence and Cohesion Lexical Resource Grammatical Range and Accuracy
9
  1. fully satisfies all the requirements of the task
  2. clearly presents a fully developed response
  1. uses cohesion in such a way that it attracts no attention
  2. skillfully manages paragraphing
uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features; rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’ uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy; rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’
8
  1. covers all requirements of the task sufficiently
  2. presents, highlights and illustrates key features / bullet points clearly and appropriately
  1. sequences information and ideas logically
  2. manages all aspects of cohesion well
  3. uses paragraphing sufficiently and appropriately
  1. uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly to convey precise meanings
  2. skillfully uses uncommon lexical items but there may be occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation
  3. produces rare errors in spelling and/or word formation
  1. uses a wide range of structures
  2. the majority of sentences are error-free
  3. makes only very occasional errors or inappropriacies
7
  1. covers the requirements of the task
  2. (Academic) presents a clear overview of main trends, differences or stages
  3. (General Training) presents a clear purpose, with the tone consistent and appropriate
  4. clearly presents and highlights key features / bullet points but could be more fully extended
  1. logically organises information and ideas; there is clear progression throughout
  2. uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately although there may be some under-/over-use
  1. uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision
  2. uses less common lexical items with some awareness of style and collocation
  3. may produce occasional errors in word choice, spelling and/or word formation
  1. uses a variety of complex structures
  2. produces frequent error-free sentences
  3. has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make a few errors
6
  1. addresses the requirements of the task
  2. (Academic) presents an overview with information appropriately selected
  3. (General Training) presents a purpose that is generally clear; there may be inconsistencies in tone
  4. presents and adequately highlights key features / bullet points but details may be irrelevant, inappropriate or inaccurate
  1. arranges information and ideas coherently and there is a clear overall progression
  2. uses cohesive devices effectively, but cohesion within and/or between sentences may be faulty or mechanical
  3. may not always use referencing clearly or appropriately
  1. uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task
  2. attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy
  3. makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation, but they do not impede communication
  1. uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms
     
  2. makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they rarely reduce communication
5
  1. generally addresses the task; the format may be inappropriate in places
  2. (Academic) recounts detail mechanically with no clear overview; there may be no data to support the description
  3. (General Training) may present a purpose for the letter that is unclear at times; the tone may be variable and sometimes inappropriate
  4. presents, but inadequately covers, key features / bullet points; there may be a tendency to focus on details
  1. presents information with some organization but there may be a lack of overall progression
  2. makes inadequate, inaccurate or over-use of cohesive devices
  3. may be repetitive because of lack of referencing and substitution
  1. uses a limited range of vocabulary, but this is minimally adequate for the task
  2. may make noticeable errors in spelling and/or word formation that may cause some difficulty for the reader
  1. uses only a limited range of structures
  2. attempts complex sentences but these tend to be less accurate than simple sentences
  3. may make frequent grammatical errors and
    punctuation may be faulty; errors can cause some difficulty for the reader
4
  1. attempts to address the task but does not cover all key features / bullet points; the format may be inappropriate
  2. (General Training) fails to clearly explain the purpose of the letter; the tone may be inappropriate
  3. may confuse key features / bullet points with detail; parts may be unclear, irrelevant, repetitive or inaccurate
  1. presents information and ideas but these are not arranged coherently and there is no clear progression in the response
  2. uses some basic cohesive devices but these may be inaccurate or repetitive
  1. uses only basic vocabulary which may be used repetitively or which may be inappropriate for the task
  2. has limited control of word formation and/or spelling;
  3. errors may cause strain for the reader
  1. uses only a very limited range of structures with only rare use of subordinate clauses
  2. some structures are accurate but errors predominate, and punctuation is often faulty
3
  1. fails to address the task, which may have been completely misunderstood
  2. presents limited ideas which may be largely irrelevant/repetitive
  1. does not organize ideas logically
  2. may use a very limited range of cohesive devices, and those used may not indicate a logical relationship between ideas
  1. uses only a very limited range of words and expressions with very limited control of word formation and/or spelling
  2. errors may severely distort the message
attempts sentence forms but errors in grammar and punctuation predominate and distort the meaning
2 answer is barely related to the task has very little control of organizational features uses an extremely limited range of vocabulary; essentially no control of word formation and/or spelling cannot use sentence forms except in memorized phrases
1 answer is completely unrelated to the task fails to communicate any message can only use a few isolated words cannot use sentence forms at all

 

IELTS Speaking marking schemes

According to NEO English Below are the standards which the examiner is checking to see in the examinee's Speaking of English.

  1. Command over English

  2. Contents

  3. Knowledge

  4. Fluency

  5. Flow of sentences

  6. Grammar

  7. Face expression when explaining

  8. Arms, Hands, etc., and other gestures

  9. Interesting or not

  10. Overall Quality

Max. band = 8 for showing exceptional quality.
 

http://www.ysapak.com